Early access — we're selecting our first design partners

Run 80% of your AI on hardware you control.
Burst the other 20% to the cloud, on your terms.

Most of what companies actually use LLMs for — summarising, extracting, classifying, drafting, searching internal knowledge — runs perfectly well on a local model you own. Sending all of it to a frontier API means paying premium rates for routine work, and handing your data to someone else to do it.

Hybrid Intelligence deploys open models inside your network, fine-tunes them on your data, and puts a policy layer in front so only the genuinely hard 20% ever leaves — redacted, logged, and by your rules.

  • Your hardwareor your private cloud tenancy
  • Your weightsfine-tuned models you keep
  • Your rulesyou decide what may leave

The thesis

Not everything needs a frontier model

The industry defaulted to sending every token to the largest available model. It's simple, and it's expensive — technically and commercially. The split we build around:

80%

Runs locally

Open models on your own GPUs, tuned to your domain.

  • Summarising documents, calls and tickets
  • Extracting structured fields from unstructured text
  • Classification, routing and triage
  • Search and Q&A across internal knowledge
  • First-draft writing in your house style
  • Anything touching regulated or confidential data

Marginal cost per query approaches zero once the hardware is in.

20%

Bursts to the cloud

Frontier models, called deliberately rather than by default.

  • Long multi-step reasoning and planning
  • Complex code generation and refactoring
  • Genuinely novel or open-ended problems
  • Peak load your local capacity can't absorb
  • Capabilities no open model has yet

Sensitive fields redacted before the call. Every request logged.

The exact ratio is yours, not ours — we measure it from your real traffic before recommending any hardware. For some teams it's 95/5. For others local only clears 60% on day one and climbs as the fine-tune matures. The point is that the split should be a decision you make, not an accident of which SDK you installed first.

Architecture

One gateway. Two destinations. A boundary you define.

YOUR NETWORK — DATA NEVER LEAVES Your apps Internal tools Chat & copilots Batch pipelines Hybrid Gateway Classify request Apply your policy Route · log · cost-cap OpenAI-compatible API Local models Open weights, on prem Fine-tuned on your data Your GPUs · your VPC Weights you own Knowledge index Docs · wikis · tickets Email · code · records Permission-aware search Cited answers ~80% POLICY BOUNDARY Redact Strip PII Mask IDs Audit log Frontier models Your choice of provider Hardest reasoning Overflow capacity Swappable, not locked in Sees only what you allow ~20%

Your applications talk to one OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Swapping a model, moving more work local as your fine-tune improves, or changing cloud provider is a config change on our side — not a rewrite on yours.

What we do

Four things, done properly

Stays inside your network

Deploy models locally

We size the hardware against your actual traffic, stand up open-weight models on it, and wire them into your applications behind a stable API. On your metal, in your data centre, or in a private tenancy you control — your call.

Sizing · procurement advice · inference stack · monitoring

Stays inside your network

Fine-tune on your data, safely

Your documents, tickets, transcripts and code become a model that speaks your domain. Training happens inside your boundary, the resulting weights belong to you, and nothing is used to improve anyone else's model — including ours.

Dataset prep · LoRA & full fine-tunes · eval harness · retraining

Stays inside your network

Make internal knowledge searchable

Most companies already have the answer written down somewhere nobody can find. We index it and put a search layer over it that respects existing permissions and cites its sources, so answers can be checked rather than trusted blindly.

Connectors · permission-aware retrieval · citations · freshness

Crosses the boundary, under policy

Integrate the cloud, deliberately

When a task genuinely needs a frontier model, the gateway sends it — after redaction, against your policy, inside your budget, with a record of what went. You get the capability without the default of everything leaving.

Routing rules · redaction · spend caps · full audit trail

Who it's for

Different reasons, same architecture

We're deliberately talking to four groups right now, because the local-first argument lands differently in each — and part of what we're trying to learn is where it lands hardest.

Regulated mid-market

Finance · legal · healthcare · insurance

You have the use cases and the appetite, but client confidentiality, professional privilege or patient data means the obvious tools are off the table. Local inference removes the objection rather than working around it.

Enterprise IT & the CTO office

Cost control · vendor independence

Inference spend is growing faster than the value it returns, and it's concentrated in one vendor. Moving routine volume onto owned hardware turns a rising variable cost into a fixed one, and keeps a credible exit from any provider.

Tech-forward SMBs

Agencies · consultancies · software teams

You're already using LLMs heavily and the bill is becoming a real line item. A modest local setup absorbs the repetitive volume, and you keep frontier access for the work that actually justifies it.

Government & defence

Sovereignty · air-gapped environments

Where the data cannot cross a border or a boundary at all, the cloud half simply gets switched off. The same stack runs fully disconnected, which is exactly the scenario a local-first design is built for.

About us

We think the default is wrong

Hybrid Intelligence started from a straightforward observation: the way most companies adopted LLMs — route everything to the biggest available API and worry about it later — is a decision almost nobody made on purpose. It was the path of least resistance, and it has two costs that only show up once you're committed. The bill scales with usage forever, and your data becomes someone else's input.

Open models have quietly become good enough that this trade-off is no longer necessary for the bulk of real work. A well-chosen open model, fine-tuned on your own material and running on hardware you own, handles the routine majority at a marginal cost approaching zero — and it does it without your documents leaving the building. The remaining hard problems still deserve a frontier model. They're just a much smaller share of the total than the current architecture assumes.

We're an independent practice, not a reseller. We don't take commission from a cloud provider or a hardware vendor, which means the recommendation to run something locally — or to keep paying for the API, where that's genuinely the right answer — isn't influenced by who pays us. You keep the weights, you keep the infrastructure, and you can carry on without us.